On Friday we had some interesting discussions about
dance competition and exams and its impact on the students and the place of
culture in dance. During the chat, Agata asked some questions about the relation
of theory and practice and Adesola tried to encourage us to start theorising a
topic (see her blog post Noticing to Wondering: passive to
proactive). Because of Adesola’s request, I tried to look at the
conversation through a different pair of glasses. I reflected less on the
content of the discussion but more on the nature of it. Today, I will write
down some thoughts about the process of theorising a subject:
I think it was Chelsie who talked about an experience
in Japan where she had a performance with dancers from all over the world. She
stated that if they all would have had a better understanding of the culture of the
country they were working in and the style they were working with, their
performance would have been better. She experienced something, reflected on it
and started theorising. As we all talked about it, gathered similar
experiences, noticed and reflected, I started to wonder how this discussion
could interlink with Agata’s question about practice and theory.
In fact, I see
reflection as the first tool needed to combine practice with theory. We do
something, we experience it and we reflect on it. During the process of
reflection, as J. A. Moon suggests, we think about something we already know. ‘It
is a process of re-organizing knowledge and emotional orientations in order to
achieve further insights.’(1) After
reflecting on something and maybe learning something new out of a practical experience,
we can, in a second step, then start theorising around this reorganised knowledge.
To do so, we need additional tools like using already existing literature,
interviewing practitioners or even theorists, collecting more experience, etc.
This is the process of collecting data and this is where I am today in my
research project. I am starting to write down thoughts in my reflective
journal, reflecting on what I experience during my practice, I have confirmed two
interview appointments and I have sent out an email with a task to people I
want a response from so I can collect different stories around my inquiry.The third step would then be the writing process where we explain what how we understand this topic after careful consideration in critical review.
A last
thought: this relation between theory and practice is reciprocal. I will think
about the tools needed to turn theory into practice and post it at a later
date. Feel free to already comment with ideas.
(1) Moon, JA, 2004, A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice, London/New York: Routledge Falmer, p. 82.
(1) Moon, JA, 2004, A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice, London/New York: Routledge Falmer, p. 82.
No comments:
Post a Comment